Comments on: WordPress Benchmark: 3.0 vs 2.9.2, Part 1

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:39:41 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Mik

Mik — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:54:27 +0000

Way too many issues moving from 2.9.2 to 3.0.1 in my opionion

By: MillaN

MillaN — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:33:53 +0000

WP 3.0 is slower than WP 2.9.2 overall. But take into account all the new features added. You can’t add more things and expect to have same performance level. There is no software (for web or desktop) that can be faster with more features added. If you don’t need new things added by WP 3.0, than don’t use it, but saying that WP 3.0 is slower, is not the same thing as saying that WP 3.0 is actually better that WP 2.9.2, and it is much better.

I am writing conclusion article for the tests that will weight in on the speed and features and, there is no contest: WP 3.0 is better.

By: Ubercart Themes

Ubercart Themes — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:44:38 +0000

I think this is a poor benchmark of wordpress and your conclusions are fairly basic.

Take the “Number of SQL queries” post. You conclude that WordPress 3 is better, but I would refute that. WordPress 3 does have less queries on pages, which are visited rarely (Dashboard, Post Edit), but it has over 10 more queries the number 1 most important page “Post”. So in the real world, I would say that this would reduce overall performance of your wordpress site. The comment page does have less queries, which might make up for it, but I doubt it.

Overall from looking at your post, I would assume wordpress 3 would make for a slower site. This is unfortunate.

By: L’hebdo WordPress | WordPress Francophone

L’hebdo WordPress | WordPress Francophone — Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:25:30 +0000

[...] frère… Dev4Press a donc décidé de faire le test. Ça se passe en plusieurs parties. La première est disponible, ainsi que la deuxième. La troisième est à [...]

By: WordPress Benchmark: 3.0 vs 2.9.2, Part 1 | WordPressPlanet.com

WordPress Benchmark: 3.0 vs 2.9.2, Part 1 | WordPressPlanet.com — Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:41:07 +0000

[...] Read more: WordPress Benchmark: 3.0 vs 2.9.2, Part 1 [...]

By: Tweets that mention Dev4Press | Benchmark: WordPress Benchmark: 3.0 vs 2.9.2, Part 1 -- Topsy.com

Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:36:07 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Beatriz Torres and Beatriz Torres, Luli Maccagno. Luli Maccagno said: RT @Zirta: Gente: NO ACTUALICEN a WordPress 3.0 X( Ese monstruo chupa más memoria que nunca http://trunc.it/8x55k [...]

By: Wordpress Belarus » Blog Archive » WordPress Benchmark: 3.0 vs 2.9.2, Part 1

Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:45:05 +0000

[...] Original post: WordPress Benchmark: 3.0 vs 2.9.2, Part 1 [...]

By: MillaN

MillaN — Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:29:06 +0000

For hotlink you should see hotlink image, but images are not subject of hotlink restrictions on dev4press, maybe it’s some problem with Google Reader, I had some problems with it in the last few days.

By: shakaran

shakaran — Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:11:10 +0000

Milan I can’t see the images, maybe a rule for hotlinking? PS: Also in google reader.